United States v. Rodriguez-Flores

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 21, 2007 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-10181 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ-FLORES, also known as Memo Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-378-2 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent Guillermo Rodriguez-Flores (Rodriguez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rodriguez has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Rodriguez’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 06-10181 leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 2