United States v. Rodriguez-Flores

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 12, 2008 No. 06-10181 Charles R. Fulbruge III Conference Calendar Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. GUILLERMO RODRIGUEZ-FLORES, also known as Memo Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:02-CR-378-2 ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court granted counsel’s motion to withdraw and dismissed the appeal of Guillermo Rodriguez-Flores pursuant to Anders v. California.1 The Supreme * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 1 386 U.S. 738 (1967). United States v. Rodriguez-Flores, 236 F. App’x 138 (2007). No. 06-10181 Court vacated and remanded for further consideration in light of Gall v. United States.2 We have reconsidered this matter in light of Gall. However, nothing in the Supreme Court’s Gall decision requires us to change our prior opinion in this case.3 Accordingly, we reinstate the prior opinion. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL is DISMISSED. 2 552 U.S. __, 128 S.Ct. 586 (2008). 3 See U.S. v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 530 F.3d 381, 385-89 (5th Cir. 2008). 2