Hicks v. Marshall

JACKSON, Chief Justice,

concurring:

Whilst I do ,not mean to.disagree to any of the above, I rest my concurrence on the absence of all pleadings, and .on the second point I hold that when rent was given by the grantor to the grantee, his possession was that of the grantee, and thus the title and possession of the land were both -in the, grantee, and the payment of usury in land was complete.