The defendant in this case was convicted of violating sections 71Ó and 716 of the Penal Code, known as the “labor-contract law.” The evidence was not sufficient to authorize the conviction, and it was error to overrule the motion for a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Broyles, C. J., and Blood worth, •/., concur. E. J. Lawrence, E. L. Williams, for plaintiff in error. Wade E. Watson, solicitor, contra.