The testimony of the accomplice was sufficiently corroborated by the other facts and circumstance’s of the case; the verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial requires a reversal of the judgment below.
Judgment affirmed.
Luhe and Bloodioorth, JJ., concur. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error. J. M. Lang, solicitor-general, contra.