The conviction of the offense of larceny was amply authorized by the evidence. The special assignments of error, complaining of the court’s refusal to continue his ease and upon the court’s rulings upon the admissibility of evidence, are without merit. The plaintiff in error has had a legal trial, and for no reason pointed out in the record did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, G. J., and Bloodioorlh, J., concur.