FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 28 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GUSTAVO GOMEZ, No. 10-55860
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-07701-DMG
v.
MEMORANDUM *
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary, Dept. of
Corrections and Rehabilitation,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Dolly M. Gee, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 21, 2011 **
Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Gustavo Gomez appeals from the district court’s
judgment denying and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We may affirm on any ground supported by
the record. See Washington v. Lampert, 422 F.3d 864, 869 (9th Cir. 2005).
Gomez contends that the Board of Prison Terms’s 2007 decision finding him
unsuitable for parole is not supported by some evidence. Even assuming that his
petition is timely, Gomez is not entitled to relief because the record reflects that
Gomez received all process that was due. See Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S. Ct. 859,
862-63 (2011) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
2 10-55860