Gingery v. Merit Systems Protection Board

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit STEPHEN W. GINGERY, Petiti0ner, V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Responden.t. 2011-3225 Petition for review of the Merit SySten1S Protection Board in case no. CH3330101038-I-1. ON MOTION ORDER Stephen W. Gingery moves without opposition to re- form the official caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board as the respondent and for extensions of time to file his informal brief Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is desig~ nated as the respondent when the Board's decision con- cerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case We GINGERY V. MSPB 2 determine that the Board should be designated as the respondent Accordingly, IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) The motions to reform the official caption are granted The revised official caption is reflected above. (2) The motions for extensions of time are granted Gingery’s informal brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order. DEC 2 9 2011 Date cc: Stephen W. Gingery Devin A. Wolak, Esq. Michael Carney, Esq. s20 FOR THE COURT /s/ J an Horbaly ' J an Horbaly Clerk ElLEl1P u.s. cong oF ne ms ron t ms F nERAL macon DEC 2 9 2011 JAN HORBALY CLEIK