Intermec Technologies Corp. v. Palm, Inc.

Summarize
Check Treatment

Related Cases

       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
                 ______________________

        INTERMEC TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,
               Plaintiff-Appellant,

                            v.

                      PALM, INC.,
                   Defendant-Appellee.
                  ____________________

                       2011-1296
                 ______________________

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in No. 09-CV-0272, Judge Sue L.
Robinson.
                ______________________

                      JUDGMENT
                 ______________________

    CARSON P. VEACH, Freeborn & Peters, LLP, of
Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him
on the brief were DAVID S. BECKER and JACOB D. KOERING.

    ROBERT T. HASLAM, Covington & Burling LLP, of
Redwood Shores, California, argued for defendant-
appellee. With him on the brief were MICHAEL M.
MARKMAN and ROBERT WILLIAMS of San Francisco,
California.
               ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

   PER CURIAM (LOURIE, DYK, and REYNA, Circuit
Judges).

           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT



 January 18, 2012           /s/ Jan Horbaly
     Date                      Jan Horbaly
                                   Clerk