United States v. Scott Henry

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JAN 20 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-30352 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00178-EJL v. MEMORANDUM * SCOTT ANDREW HENRY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 17, 2012 ** Before: LEAVY, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. Scott Andrew Henry appeals from his conviction and 108-month sentence for possession of sexually explicit images of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(4)(B). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Henry’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000). Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2