UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
January 9, 2012
Nos. 09-3467, 09-3731 & 09-3965
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
CHRISTOPHER G. WRIGHT,
Appellant (No. 09-3467)
RAVINDER S. CHAWLA,
Appellant (No. 09-3731)
ANDREW TEITELMAN.
Appellant (No. 09-3965)
(E.D. Pa. No. 2-08-cr-00450-001/002/004)
Present: AMBRO, CHAGARES and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges
1. Motion by Appellee USA to Amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 04,
2012; and
2. Letter Response by Appellant, Christopher G. Wright, in Opposition to
Motion to Amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 04, 2012.
Respectfully,
Clerk/dwb
_______________________________ O R D E R ______________________________
The foregoing motion by Appellee to amend the Court’s Opinion dated January 4, 2012
is denied. The letter response construed as a cross-motion by Appellant, Christopher G.
Wright in opposition to the motion to amend is granted in part and denied in part. The
opinion is amended as follows: on page 10, first full paragraph, lines 6-7, replace “with
the intent” with “intending, in exchange for the benefits,”.
By the Court,
/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge
Dated: February 7, 2012
Appeal Nos. 09-3467, 09-3731 & 09-3965
USA v. Christopher Wright, Ravinder Chawla and Andrew Teitelman
Page 2
DWB/cc:
Jennifer A. Williams, Esq.
Lisa A. Mathewson, Esq.
Michael J. Bresnick, Esq.
Peter Goldberger, Esq.
Ellen C. Brotman, Esq.