Crassociates, Inc. v. United States

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit CRASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, V. UNITED STATES, Defen,dant-Appellee, __ AND SPECTRUM HEALTHCARE RESOURCES, INC., Defen,dan.t-Appellee. ~ 2012-5037 Appea1 from the United States Court of Federal ClaiIns in case no. 11-CV-57(}, Judge Francis M. A11egra. ON MOTION Before BRYsoN, MAYER, and LINN, Circuit Judges. BRYSON, Circuit Ju,dge. ORDER CRASsociates, Inc. (CRA) moves for 21 stay and/or in- junction pending disposition of this appeal, and to enjoin CRASSOCIATES INC V. US 2 the United States from performing any contract work awarded to Spectrum Healthcare Resources, Inc. (Spec- trum). The United States and Spectrum oppose. CRA replies. To obtain an injunction, pending appeal, a movant must establish a strong likelihood of success on the merits or, failing that, nonetheless demonstrate a substantial case on the merits provided that the harm factors militate in its favor. Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 77O, 778 (1987). ln deciding whether to grant an injuncti0n, pending appeal this court "assesses the movant's chances of success on the merits and weighs the equities as they aHect the parties and the public." E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. u. Phillips Petroleum C'o., 835 F.2d 277, 278 (Fed. Cir. 1987). See also Stcmda,rd Hcwens Prods. v. Gen.cor Indus., 897 F.2d_ 511 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Based on the arguments in the motions papers and without prejudicing the ultimate disposition of this case by a merits panel, we determine that CRA has not met its burden to obtain an injunction Accordingly, lT lS ORDERED THATZ The motion is denied FoR THE CoURT APR 02 2012 /s/ J an Horbaly Date J an Horbaly Clerk FllED . .CDURT 0F APPEALS FOB u S`l'HE FEDEF!AL ClRCUlT APR 02 2012 .lAN HDHBA\.Y CLEBK 3 cc. S Kenneth B. Weckstein, Esq. A1ny Laderberg O’Su]livan, Esq. Michael Goodman, Esq. CRASSOCIATES INC V. US