[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
FILED
No. 08-10252 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar July 30, 2008
________________________ THOMAS K. KAHN
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 06-00760-CV-1-CG-C
WILLIAMS GROUP HOME, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL
HEALTH & MENTAL RETARDATION, a public agency,
ERANELL MCINTOSH-WILSON, individually,
JERRYLN LONDON, individually,
FORDYCE MITCHEL, individually,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(July 30, 2008)
Before BIRCH, DUBINA and COX, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The district court granted the Defendants' motion for summary judgment
(Doc. 80), and the Plaintiff appeals. The Plaintiff contends that the district court
erred in granting the Defendants summary judgment on the Plaintiff's Due Process
claim, and that the district court erred in granting the Defendants summary
judgment on the Equal Protection claim (Blue Br. at 1).
The district court held that the Alabama Department of Mental Health and
Mental Retardation, a state agency, was not a "person" subject to suit under 42
U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. The Plaintiff does not challenge this holding on appeal.
Therefore, we address only the Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants in their
individual capacities.
Having considered the briefs and relevant parts of the record, we find no
reversible error. We conclude that the Defendants were due summary judgment on
the Due Process claim because, if process was due (which we need not decide),
Alabama law afforded it. And, we conclude that the district court properly granted
summary judgment on the Equal Protection claim because there was no showing
that facilities treated differently were similarly situated.
AFFIRMED.
2