[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
__________________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-10632 July 10, 2008
Non-Argument Calendar THOMAS K. KAHN
__________________________________ CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 06-61906-CV-MGC
KARI A. SCHABO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
__________________________________
(July 10, 2008)
Before TJOFLAT, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The plaintiff in this diversity case, which was removed to the district court,
seeks a declaration that she is entitled to uninsured motorist coverage for injuries
sustained in an automobile accident with an uninsured motorist. The defendant
has denied such coverage. On cross motions for summary judgment, the district
court found, in an order entered on January 18, 2008, that plaintiff was not entitled
to uninsured motorist coverage because the “primary insured knowingly and
lawfully waived uninsured motorist coverage, and then added [plaintiff] and her
vehicle to that policy without changing is material terms.” The court therefore
granted defendant summary judgment.
Plaintiff appeals. We agree, for the reasons the district court articulated in
its January 18 order, that plaintiff is not entitled to the uninsured coverage she
seeks.
AFFIRMED.
2