Maffit (David) v. Dist. Ct. (State)

Supreme Count OF Nevana (0) IM7A <> IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DAVID MAFFIT, No. 84187 Petitioner. vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK: AND THE HONORABLE FILED MONICA TRUJILLO, DISTRICT JUDGE, MAR 21 2022 Respondents, ELIZABETH A. BROWN and CLERK pe om THE STATE OF NEVADA, or cil Real Party in Interest. ORDER DENYING PETITION This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition challenging a district court order denying mandamus and/or prohibition relief in which petitioner sought dismissal of the criminal complaint and requested a jury trial. Having considered the petition and supporting documentation, we are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted because petitioner has not demonstrated that a direct appeal from a judgment of conviction would not be “a plain, speedy and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.” NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. eet! e n- ma 8 A Cheetah ay Parraguirre uv pNerbcb, 5 Hardesty Ab ge LJ. Stiglich ec: Hon. Monica Trujillo, District Judge The Pariente Law Firm, P.C. Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SuPREME COURT oF NEVADA (0) 1997A EID 9