United States v. Studie

Appellate Case: 21-5087 Document: 010110660913 Date Filed: 03/22/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 22, 2022 _________________________________ Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 21-5087 (D.C. No. 4:20-CR-00095-JFH-1) CHARLES DEAN STUDIE, (N.D. Okla.) Defendant - Appellant. _________________________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT* _________________________________ Before MATHESON, KELLY, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _________________________________ Charles Dean Studie pleaded guilty to a drug conspiracy and related firearms charges and received a 228-month prison sentence. He has appealed from that sentence despite the appeal waiver in his plea agreement. The government now moves to enforce that waiver under United States v. Hahn, 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). Through counsel, Studie emphasizes that he retains the right to bring an ineffective assistance of counsel claim via 28 U.S.C. § 2255, but he concedes that his appeal waiver deprives him of any remedy on direct appeal. * This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. Appellate Case: 21-5087 Document: 010110660913 Date Filed: 03/22/2022 Page: 2 When deciding a motion to enforce an appeal waiver, we normally ask: “(1) whether the disputed appeal falls within the scope of the waiver of appellate rights; (2) whether the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his appellate rights; and (3) whether enforcing the waiver would result in a miscarriage of justice.” Hahn, 359 F.3d at 1325. But we need not address a Hahn factor that the defendant does not dispute. See United States v. Porter, 405 F.3d 1136, 1143 (10th Cir. 2005). In light of Studie’s non-opposition, we grant the government’s motion to enforce and dismiss this appeal. Entered for the Court Per Curiam 2