State v. Pirkey

HANEY, P. J.

(dissenting.) I concur in the foregoing conclusions, except those relating to the remarks of the state’s attorney and court as to the reputation of the places mentioned by the former. In my opinion there is nothing in the record to overcome the presumption that such remarks were prejudicial to the accused. Because of such remarks, I think the judgment should be reversed.

The judgment of the court below and order denying a new trial are affirmed.