dissenting.
For the reasons stated in my dissent filed this day in State of North Carolina ex rel., Utilities Commission and Duke Power Company, Applicant v. Rufus L. Edmisten, Attorney General, No. 7610UC209, I vote to reverse that portion of the Commission’s orders authorizing Carolina Power and Light Company to apply a surcharge for the recovery of approximately $15,500,000 for fuel expenses incurred prior to 1 September 1975.