I concur in both the result and the opinion. I do so because this case deals with waste processing by a publicly owned facility. Waste disposal is both typically and traditionally a local government function. With respect to such functions, the opinion’s analysis of the significance of public ownership under C & A Carbone, Inc. v. Town of Clarkstown, 511 U.S. 383, 114 S.Ct. 1677, 128 L.Ed.2d 399 (1994), seems to me quite right. Whether the same analysis would apply to activities that are not traditionally governmental is not before us. This case therefore does not answer the question of how such situations are to be examined in light of Carbone.
United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority
Related Cases
- United Haulers Association, Inc., Transfer Systems Inc., Bliss Enterprises, Inc., Ken Wittman Sanitation, Bristol Trash Removal, Levitt's Commercial Containers, Inc. And Ingersoll Pickup Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority, County of Oneida and County of Herkimer
- City of New York v. City Civil Service Commission
- McClatchey v. City of Atlanta
- Cleveland Railway Co. v. Leis
- Boston Edison Co. v. Boston Redevelopment Authority