Same Case — On a Re-hearing.
By the court: (Slidell, J., absent.)
Eustis, C. J.I think the court had jurisdiction ralioné materia, and that its exercise was a matter of discretion, which presents no case for interference.
The other grounds presented for a re-hearing, we have considered, without changing our original convictions on the merits.
The judgment formerly rendered, therefore, stands affirmed.