Coachman v. State

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial because of the trial court’s failure to conduct a hearing concerning the state’s alleged discovery violation in failing to disclose the substance of incriminating statements allegedly made by the appellant and subsequently used against her at trial. Blatch v. State, 495 So.2d 1203 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.