Roth v. State

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Roth v. State, 601 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on certified conflict with Tarawneh v. State, 588 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), review *12denied, 598 So.2d 78 (Fla.1992), disapproved, Hayles v. State, 608 So.2d 13 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on Hayles, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.