Shannon King v. Gmac Mortgage, LLC

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 23 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SHANNON KING, No. 10-17929 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:09-cv-01425-JCM- LRL v. GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, MEMORANDUM* Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 17, 2012 San Francisco, California Before: SCHROEDER, O’SCANNLAIN, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. Shannon King appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of her mortgagee, GMAC Mortgage, LLC (“GMAC”). The district court did not err in granting GMAC summary judgment on any of King’s claims: As King had fallen behind on her mortgage payments, she is * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. unable to make a claim for misrepresentation, promissory estoppel, or wrongful foreclosure. Bulbman, Inc. v. Nev. Bell, 825 P.2d 588, 592 (Nev. 1992) (per curiam); Pink v. Busch, 691 P.2d 456, 459 (Nev. 1984) (per curiam); Collins v. Union Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 662 P.2d 610, 623 (Nev. 1983). King’s breach of contract claim is barred by the statute of frauds. Nev. Rev. Stat. § 111.210(1). And King is unable to make a claim for unjust enrichment since there was a valid mortgage agreement between the parties. Leasepartners Corp. v. Robert L. Brooks Trust, 942 P.2d 182, 187 (Nev. 1997) (per curiam). King’s remaining contentions are either waived or without merit. AFFIRMED. 2