Shubbie v. La Board of Pardons

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT __________________ No. 95-30635 Conference Calendar __________________ MILTON L. SHUBBIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus LOUISIANA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. CA-95-0321 - - - - - - - - - - (October 17, 1995) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Milton L. Shubbie filed a federal petition for writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, which the district court dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because he was no longer in custody. To the extent that Shubbie alleged a civil rights violation, the district court dismissed the complaint as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. * Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. No. 95-30635 -2- Shubbie has failed to raise or brief the statute of limitations issue and, therefore, it is considered abandoned. Evans v. City of Marlin, Tex., 986 F.2d 104, 106 n.1 (5th Cir. 1993). The appeal of his civil rights complaint is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Generally, a state petitioner must obtain a certificate of probable cause (CPC) to appeal the dismissal of a § 2254 petition. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). In Louisiana v. Merriman, No. 92-4222 (5th Cir. July 23, 1995), this court ordered that "the Clerk is to accept no more appeals for or on behalf of [Milton L. Shubbie] that challenge the length or basis of [his] state custody. This is a sanction for appellant[]'s abuse of this court's procedures." Therefore, to the extent that Shubbie is challenging the basis of his state custody, he may not appeal the district court's dismissal of the petition. The motion for CPC is DENIED. We bar Shubbie from filing any civil appeal in this court, or any initial pleading in any court which is subject to this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court or of this court. The clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this circuit are ordered to return, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar.