UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-1853
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS,
Party-in-Interest - Appellant,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
NIKKI HALEY, in her official capacity as the Governor of
South Carolina; STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:11-cv-02958-RMG)
Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se. Robert D. Cook,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, James Emory
Smith, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, M.D., M.P.H., appeals
the district court’s order denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motion asking that the district court reverse its denial of her
motion to intervene in the district court action. Assa’ad-
Faltas has also moved for in forma pauperis status. We have
reviewed the record and find that Assa’ad-Faltas’s motion failed
to establish any of the grounds necessary for Rule 60(b) relief.
Accordingly, although we grant Assa’ad-Faltas’s application for
in forma pauperis status, we affirm the district court’s order.
See Assa’ad-Faltas v. Haley, No. 2:11-cv-02958-RMG (D.S.C. June
27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3