UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2447
HIEDA A. KEELER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES D. FOX, Police Chief; THOMAS A. SHULL, JR., Officer;
OFFICER DAVID GREEN; JUSTIN BRIGGS, Officer; MICHELLE
RIVERA, Officer; JOHN POLAK, Sargeant; LIEUTENANT SUTTON; M.
JOHNSON, Detective; HOSE H. HERNANDEZ-ZAMORA, Officer; LARRY
MINKOFF, Captain; NEWPORT NEWS SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; GABE
MORGAN, Sheriff; SHERIFF MALE, responded to Riverside;
VIRGINIA BEACH PSYCHIATRIC CENTER; STEPHEN G. CUNNINGHAM,
Dr.; MARK G. CLARKE, Dr.; JUDITH DOCKERY, Attorney; OFFICER
NEIDENGARD; OFFICER JUNEAU; SARGEANT HINES; OFFICER HANKINS;
PAUL COMPTON, Virginia State Police Trooper; TONY PASSARO,
Virginia State Police Trooper; DARRELL HOLLOWELL, Virginia
State Police Trooper; FEMALE EMT, Newport News EMT; MALE
EMT, Newport News EMT; CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS; SHERIFF FEMALE,
responded to Riverside; CHAD DORSK, Attorney,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00325-AWA-TEM)
Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hieda A. Keeler, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Mary August Huffman,
HANCOCK DANIEL JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Glen Allen, Virginia; Megan
Paulita Bradshaw, Dante Medardo Filetti, GOODMAN, ALLEN &
FILETTI, PLLC, Norfolk, Virginia; Farnaz Farkish, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Darlene P.
Bradberry, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia;
Joshua James Coe, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Hieda A. Keeler seeks to appeal the district court’s
order permitting the substitution of defense counsel, denying
her motion for appointment of counsel, and various other issues.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The
issues Keeler seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor
appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3