UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1328
HIEDA A. KEELER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
POLICE CHIEF JAMES D. FOX; OFFICER THOMAS A. SHULL, JR.;
OFFICER DAVID GREEN; OFFICER JUSTIN BRIGGS; OFFICER MICHELLE
RIVERA; SERGEANT JOHN POLAK; LIEUTENANT SUTTON; DETECTIVE M.
JOHNSON; OFFICER HOSE H. HERNANDEZ-ZAMORA; CAPTAIN LARRY
MINKOFF; NEWPORT NEWS SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF GABE
MORGAN; SHERIFF MALE, responded to Riverside; SHERIFF
FEMALE, responded to Riverside; VIRGINIA BEACH PSYCHIATRIC
CENTER; DR. STEPHEN G. CUNNINGHAM; DR. MARK G. CLARKE;
ATTORNEY JUDITH DOCKERY; ATTORNEY CHAD DORSK; OFFICER
NEIDENGARD; OFFICER JUNEAU; SERGEANT HINES; OFFICER HANKINS;
PAUL COMPTON, Virginia State Police Trooper; TONY PASSARO,
Virginia State Police Trooper; DARRELL HOLLOWELL, Virginia
State Police Trooper; FEMALE EMT, Newport News EMT; MALE
EMT, Newport News EMT; CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00325-AWA-TEM)
Submitted: June 20, 2013 Decided: June 25, 2013
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hieda A. Keeler, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Rodney Seth Dillman,
HANCOCK, DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia;
Megan Paulita Bradshaw, Dante Medardo Filetti, GOODMAN, ALLEN &
FILETTI, PLLC, Norfolk, Virginia; Farnaz Farkish, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Joshua James
Coe, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Darlene P. Bradberry, OFFICE OF
THE CITY ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Hieda A. Keeler appeals the district court’s order
denying her “Motion to deny Consent Order Granting Substitution
of Attorney,” “Motion for Hearing,” and “Motion for Recusal,”
and dismissing her civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Keeler v. Fox, No. 2:12-cv-00325-AWA-TEM (E.D. Va. Feb.
19, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3