| Matter of Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v Town of Brighton |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 05408 |
| Decided on September 30, 2022 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on September 30, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND NEMOYER, JJ.
613 CA 21-01440
v
TOWN OF BRIGHTON, TOWN BOARD OF TOWN OF BRIGHTON, TOWN OF BRIGHTON PLANNING BOARD, DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA, LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., M & F, LLC, THE DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES, RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 6.)
HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (AARON M. SAYKIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS TOWN OF BRIGHTON, TOWN BOARD OF TOWN OF BRIGHTON, AND TOWN OF BRIGHTON PLANNING BOARD.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (WARREN B. ROSENBAUM OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA, LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., M & F, LLC, AND THE DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered September 27, 2021. The order denied the motion of petitioners-plaintiffs for a preliminary injunction.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Brighton Grassroots, LLC v Town of Brighton Planning Bd. ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [Sept. 30, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).
Entered: September 30, 2022
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court