| Matter of Save Monroe Ave., Inc. v Town of Brighton |
| 2023 NY Slip Op 03153 |
| Decided on June 9, 2023 |
| Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on June 9, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, BANNISTER, MONTOUR, AND GREENWOOD, JJ.
521 CA 22-00538
v
TOWN OF BRIGHTON, NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR, RAMSEY BOEHNER, IN HIS CAPACITY AS BUILDING INSPECTOR, TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF BRIGHTON, DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA, LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., AND M & F, LLC, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. (PROCEEDING NO. 1.)
IN THE MATTER OF BRIGHTON GRASSROOTS, LLC, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,
v
TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, TOWN OF BRIGHTON, NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR, TOWN OF BRIGHTON, M & F, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA MUCCA, LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, COLLECTIVELY DOING BUSINESS AS DANIELE FAMILY COMPANIES, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. (PROCEEDING NO. 2.) (APPEAL NO. 4.)
HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (AARON M. SAYKIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS IN PROCEEDING NO. 1.
THE ZOGHLIN GROUP, PLLC, ROCHESTER (MINDY L. ZOGHLIN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT IN PROCEEDING NO. 2.
WEAVER MANCUSO BRIGHTMAN PLLC, ROCHESTER (JOHN A. MANCUSO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS TOWN OF BRIGHTON, NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR, RAMSEY BOEHNER, IN HIS CAPACITY AS BUILDING INSPECTOR, TOWN OF BRIGHTON ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS, AND TOWN OF BRIGHTON.
WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (JOHN C. NUTTER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS DANIELE MANAGEMENT, LLC, DANIELE SPC, LLC, MUCCA
MUCCA, LLC, MARDANTH ENTERPRISES, INC., AND M & F, LLC.Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (J. Scott Odorisi, J.), entered March 5, 2022, in proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78. The order dismissed the petitions.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeals are unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy , 140 AD2d 988, 988 [4th Dept 1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts , 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1st Dept 1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).
Entered: June 9, 2023
Ann Dillon Flynn
Clerk of the Court