Providence Wire Works, Inc. v. Mulry

On Motion for Reargument.

Per Curiam.

After our opinion in the above case was filed, the respondent H. T. Mulry asked and received permission to present a motion for leave to reargue. Pursuant thereto he has filed such a motion, stating therein certain reasons on which he bases, his contention that justice requires a reargument of the case.

We have carefully considered those reasons and we are of the opinion that they suggest nothing which in the circumstances warrants a reargument.

Motion denied.