Oram v. Oram

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan January 11, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 134670 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver LATIF Z. ORAM a/k/a RANDY Z. ORAM, Marilyn Kelly Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/ Maura D. Corrigan Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices and O.B. PROPERITES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/ Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party Defendant, and O. B. PROPERTIES and JAM SOUND SPECIALIST, INC., Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/ Counter-Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v SC: 134670 COA: 267077 Oakland CC: 2002-039499-CK JOHN ORAM and GARY ORAM, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/ Counter-Defendants-Appellees, and INTERNATIONAL OUTDOOR, INC., VISION PROPERTIES, INC., DISCOUNT PAGING COMPANY, INC., and FUTURE VISION PROPERTIES, LLC, Third-Party Defendants, and ARMAND VELARDO, S. HADDAD, and BRADLEY LAMBERT, Intervening Plaintiffs, and 2 HARRY CENDROWSKI, Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee. _________________________________________/ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the circuit court properly imposed the sanction of dismissal with prejudice and whether the dismissal order was a “verdict” as defined in MCR 2.403(O)(4) for purposes of ordering case evaluation sanctions. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. January 11, 2008 _________________________________________ s0108 Clerk