Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a (2022 NY Slip Op 06621)
Matter of Attorneys In Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
2022 NY Slip Op 06621
Decided on November 18, 2022
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Per Curiam
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 18, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, WINSLOW, AND MONTOUR, JJ. (Filed Nov. 18, 2022.)
&em;

[*1]MATTER OF ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468-a AND 22 NYCRR 118.1, RESPONDENTS. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMITTEES FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, PETITIONER.


OPINION AND ORDER

Order of suspension entered.


Per Curiam

Opinion: In March 2022, the Grievance Committees applied to this Court for an order directing the respondents named on the attached list to show cause why they should not be suspended from the practice of law on the grounds that they violated Judiciary Law § 468-a and 22 NYCRR 118.1 by failing to comply with attorney registration requirements, and that they failed to respond to numerous written inquiries from the Office of Court Administration and the Grievance Committees concerning their registration delinquency. By order entered April 28, 2022, this Court directed respondents to show cause in writing on or before August 1, 2022, why they should not be suspended for failing to comply with attorney registration requirements. Respondents either failed to respond to the show cause order or otherwise failed to show cause why they should not be suspended.

The failure to comply with attorney registration requirements violates Judiciary Law § 468-a and 22 NYCRR 118.1 and constitutes conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice warranting the imposition of discipline (see Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 54 AD3d 9, 10 [4th Dept 2008]). Accordingly, we conclude that the respondents named on the attached list should be suspended, effective immediately, and until further order of this Court.

Name Registration IDYear Admitted

Adiutori, Candace Marie3954278 2001

Ames, Sr., Peter A. 1879576 1983

Assefa, Yohannes 4064408 2002

Bains, Sachpreet Singh5304100 2015

Benigno, Anthony Michael1859222 1983

Cadin, Luke James 4980314 2012

Clarke, Hillary Gardiner2505006 1992

Cohen, Michelle Ruth2649416 1995

Colabufo, Paul John 4274197 2005

Collins, Thomas George1692052 1978

Douglas, David Colin1341122 1976

Dudeck, Joshua Lawrence4808457 2010

Dutcher, Jay Frederick2886281 1998

Feger, Karen Beth 4111456 2003

Frood, Neil Stewart 3009040 2000

Greenhouse, Andrew Alan4123766 2003

Gucciardo, John 1742170 1981

Heald, Timothy P. 2049161 1986

Herzbrun, Yonatan Shai5362025 2015

Kerwick, Ann Marie 1898543 1977

Klein, Pamela Jeanne2424166 1991

Knauf, Katharine Ruth4387049 2006

Kouwe, Robert E. 1779701 1982

Lamitie, William John2552602 1993

Lehouillier, Patric Jaymes 2259711 1975

Marzullo, Thomas G. 1842798 1983

McElroy, Melinda L. 2938298 1999

Murray, Nicola Rosemarie 4233532 2004

Odojewski (Mical),

Alison Lorraine 3055308 2000

Primo, Steven James 2003481 1985

Readling, John Anthony4206637 2004

Remmling, Marc Erik 2645778 1995

Rodriguez, Angela L.2604742 1994

Schaller, Pamela Susan4812152 2010

Tuppen, James Lawrence1603752 1978

Young, Therese A. 5360680 2015