UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7996
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RODERICK LAMAR WILLIAMS, a/k/a Rox,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00004-RLV-DSC-8)
Submitted: April 15, 2013 Decided: April 23, 2013
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Lamar Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Roderick Lamar Williams appeals the district court’s
order denying him a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). * We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motion to
place this appeal in abeyance, and we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No.
5:03-cr-00004-RLV-DSC-8 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 31, 2012). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Although the district court indicated that it entered the
order upon motion of the defendant, we note that the court
entered the order upon its own motion. Because Williams is not
entitled to a sentence reduction, however, we conclude that
remand to correct this error would be pointless.
2