Stewart-Brunelle v. Wal-Mart

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 7 LAUREN STEWART-BRUNELLE, 8 Plaintiff-Appellant, 9 v. NO. 31,084 10 WAL-MART STORES, INC., a 11 foreign company doing business in 12 the State of New Mexico, and 13 OUDALOM SOUMPHOLPHAKDY, 14 Pharm. D. RPH, 15 Defendants-Appellees. 16 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 17 Carl J. Butkus, District Judge 18 Roger Eaton 19 Albuquerque, NM 20 for Appellant 21 Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A. 22 Alex C. Walker 23 Tiffany L. Roach 24 Albuquerque, NM 25 for Appellees 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 VANZI, Judge. 3 Plaintiff appeals an order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment 4 on Plaintiff’s claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress. In this Court’s 5 notice of proposed summary disposition, we proposed to affirm. Defendants have 6 filed a memorandum in support. Plaintiff has not filed a memorandum in opposition, 7 and the time to do so has passed. “Failure to file a memorandum in opposition 8 constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.” Frick v. 9 Veazey, 116 N.M. 246, 247, 861 P.2d 287, 288 (Ct. App. 1993). Because no party 10 opposes our proposed summary disposition, we affirm for the reasons provided in our 11 notice. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 __________________________________ 14 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 15 WE CONCUR: 16 _________________________________ 17 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge 2 1 _________________________________ 2 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 3