Michael Graves v. Navy

Case: 13-3077 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 06/13/2013 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MICHAEL B. GRAVES, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent. ______________________ 2013-3077 ______________________ Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF3330100788-X-1. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ ORDER Michael B. Graves moves for correction of docketing information and the relief sought in his “Application for Enforcement.” We note that Mr. Graves has filed a petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s December 27, 2012 final order. To the extent Mr. Graves is arguing the merits of his case in that part of his submission enti- tled “Application for Enforcement,” these arguments belong in his briefs on the merits of his petition for re- view. Case: 13-3077 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 06/13/2013 2 MICHAEL GRAVES v. NAVY Mr. Graves also argues that the “date of docketing” for this case is February 20, 2013, the day the court received the petition for review, not February 26, 2013. As Mr. Graves’s motion notes, however, the Practice Notes to Federal Circuit Rule 15 indicate: A petition for review . . . is filed when the pe- tition for review . . . is received in the court . . . . A petition for review . . . is docketed when it is assigned a docket number, a docket card for the petition for review . . . is made avail- able to the public, and the names of the par- ties to the petition for review . . . are recorded in the party index that is available to the public. Accordingly, there is no reason to change the date of docketing for Mr. Graves’s petition for review. IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motions are denied. FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk s25