United States v. Patrick Carby

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 24 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-10665 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00778-DGC v. MEMORANDUM * PATRICK GARY CARBY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 18, 2013 ** Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. Patrick Gary Carby appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Carby’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No answering brief has been filed. Carby has filed a pro se supplemental brief, arguing for the first time on appeal that the district court improperly imposed a three-year term of supervised release. The district court did not plainly err in imposing a term of supervised release. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 11-10665