Thornock v. State

MR. JUSTICE HUNT,

dissenting:

In this Opinion, as in Thornock v. Pack River Management Co. (1987), [227 Mont. 524,] 740 P.2d 149, the majority posits an argument which denies Larry Thornock any third party action recovery for the tragic amputation of his left arm. I disagree with the result of the majority opinion and would reverse the judgment of the District Court.

MR. JUSTICE SHEEHY concurs in the foregoing dissent of MR. JUSTICE HUNT.