concurring.
[¶ 19] The dissent’s criticizing and impugning the father and the trial judge is, I believe, unfair and unwarranted.
[¶ 20] Although the dissent seeks to “invoke Justice Levine” as support, only by redetermining the credibility of witnesses and reweighing the evidence — things Justice Levine constantly reminded this Court it cannot do — -can the dissent reach its result.
[¶ 21] Dale V. Sandstrom