Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.

McCOMB, J.—I dissent.

I would reverse the judgment, for the reasons expressed by Mr. Justice Patrosso in the opinion prepared by him for the District Court of Appeal in Vinnell Co. v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co., (Cal.App.), 334 P.2d 139.

Schauer, J., concurred.

Appellant’s petition for a rehearing was denied July 22, 1959. Schauer, J., and McComb, J., were of the opinion that the petition should be granted.