Doe v. Roe

Undercofler, Presiding Justice,

concurring specially.

In my opinion the only issue here is whether the petitioner presently has an enforceable right in the name of his minor son. Under Ga. L. 1973, p. 504 (Code Ann. § *32079-501) enacted after our decision in Fulghum v. Paul, 229 Ga. 463 (192 SE2d 376) (1972), he has such right. For this reason I concur in the affirmance of the trial court’s order.

I am authorized to state that Justice Ingram concurs in this special concurrence.