joined by Justice Hamilton, dissenting.
While I agree with the majority that the coverage of the Traders & General policy extended to all premises owned, rented or controlled by Mizell even though the same were not described in the original policy or endorsed thereon, it is my opinion that the premises where the accident in this case occurred were not owned, rented or controlled by Mizell within the meaning of the policy. I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals.
Opinion delivered March 30, 1960.
Second rehearing overruled May 18, 1960.