joined by Justices Calvert and Culver, dissenting.
For the reasons stated in its opinion, I agree with the Court of Civil Appeals that the mineral interests were not intended to be conveyed by the deed in question. 325 S.W. 2d 834. It would be necessary to decide other questions if this view were adopted by the majority, but no useful purpose will be served by attempting to discuss such questions here.
Four motions for rehearing overruled May 11, 1960.
Opinion delivered March 30, 1960.