Reed v. James

On Motion for Rehearing.

We wish to acknowledge a misstatement of the record in our original opinion, wherein we stated that this cause was submitted upon the one issue set out in the opinion. There was in fact another issue submitted. In response to appellants’ request the following issue was submitted to the jury: “Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that plaintiffs canceled said contract with the defendants on April 26, 1932?” To which the jury answered, “No.” However, this fact'in no way affects our original decision and we adhere to same.

Appellants’ motion for a rehearing will be overruled.