Advanced Technology v. Us

Case: 13-1305 Document: 37 Page: 1 Filed: 07/02/2013 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY & MATERIALS CO., LTD., BEIJING GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS COMPANY, AND GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, AND BOSUN TOOLS GROUPS CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, AND DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, Defendant-Appellee, AND WEIHAI XIANGGUANG MECHANICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. AND QINGDAO SHINHAN DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Defendants. Case: 13-1305 Document: 37 Page: 2 Filed: 07/02/2013 2 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY v. US ______________________ 2013-1305 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in consolidated Nos. 09-CV-0511 and 06-CV-0246, Senior Judge R. Kenton Musgrave. ------------------------------------------- ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY & MATERIALS CO., LTD., BEIJING GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS COMPANY, AND GANG YAN DIAMOND PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiffs, AND UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant, AND BOSUN TOOLS GROUPS CO., LTD., Plaintiff, v. DIAMOND SAWBLADES MANUFACTURERS COALITION, Defendant-Appellee, AND WEIHAI XIANGGUANG MECHANICAL INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD. AND QINGDAO SHINHAN DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD., Defendants. Case: 13-1305 Document: 37 Page: 3 Filed: 07/02/2013 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY v. US 3 ______________________ 2013-1423 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in consolidated Nos. 09-CV-0511 and 06-CV-0246, Senior Judge R. Kenton Musgrave. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ ORDER The United States moves without opposition to revise the caption to designate the United States as “defendant- appellant” in appeal No. 2013-1423. The United States also moves without opposition to withdraw appeal no. 2013-1423. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to reform the caption in appeal No. 2013-1423 is granted. The revised official caption for appeal No. 2013-1423 is reflected above. (2) The motion to withdraw appeal No. 2013-1423 is granted. The appeal is dismissed. (3) Each side shall bear its own costs in appeal No. 2013-1423. (4) The revised official caption for 2013-1305 is re- flected above. (5) All other pending motions are denied as moot. Case: 13-1305 Document: 37 Page: 4 Filed: 07/02/2013 4 ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY v. US FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk s25 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (As To 2013-1423 Only): July 2, 2013