UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7657
JAMES ALLEN HAMMOND,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
RICHARD S. LINDLER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
Judge. (CA-93-3345-2-8AJ)
Submitted: November 30, 1995 Decided: January 16, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Allen Hammond, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal
period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an
extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day
period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to
relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered
its order on October 20, 1994; Appellant's notice of appeal was
filed on October 30, 1995. We note that on December 11, 1995, the
district court entered an order granting Appellant's October 30,
1995, motion for belated appeal. However, the time periods estab-
lished by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional."
Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978)
(quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)), and
Fed. R. App. P. 4 does not provide the district court with juris-
diction to grant such an extension of the appeal period. Appel-
lant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of
the appeal period deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider
this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2