UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6897
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
versus
CRAIG O. COPLEY,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District
Judge; Alexander B. Denson, Magistrate Judge. (CA-90-47-HC-BR)
Submitted: November 15, 1995 Decided: January 29, 1996
Before HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Craig O. Copley, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen Coffey Moore, Fenita
Talore Morris, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order revoking his
conditional release pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 4246(f) (West 1985).
We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Copley, No. CA-
90-47-HC-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 1995). Additionally, we find that
Appellant's revocation hearing was not unnecessarily delayed in
violation of § 4246(f). In light of this disposition, we deny
Appellant's Petition to Dismiss Violation of Conditional Release-
Discharge and his Notice of Motion for an Order. In addition,
Appellant's motion for an expedited appeal is moot and is dismissed
for that reason. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2