UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7051
ROBERT LEON BUCKNER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND; BALTIMORE
COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; BALTIMORE CITY
POLICE DEPARTMENT; ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY POLICE
DEPARTMENT; BALTIMORE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPART-
MENT; ARCHIE GEE, Warden, Patuxent Institu-
tion; KEITH GREENE, Officer, DOC Office,
Patuxent; JAMES M. DEAN, Warden, Baltimore
County Detention Center; COMMISSIONER OF
CORRECTION OF MARYLAND; STATE ADMINISTRATION
BOARD OF ELECTION LAWS; UNKNOWN MEDICAL CON-
TRACTOR AND CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS; BRYANT K.
HOWARD, P.A.; DOCTOR ASHBY, M.D.; UNKNOWN
NURSES; MS. JOHNSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-
95-159-S)
Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 2, 1996
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Leon Buckner, Appellant Pro Se. Stanley J. Schapiro, Linda
T. Cox, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Towson, Maryland; John Joseph
Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Buckner v. Governor of Maryland, No. CA-95-159-S (D. Md.
June 19, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion to appoint counsel and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2