United States v. Stansbury

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6936 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TROY DONYEL STANSBURY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR- 89-434-S) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Troy Donyel Stansbury, Appellant Pro Se. Harvey Ellis Eisenberg, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his "Mo- tion to Abolish Supervised Release" as frivolous. Our review of the record discloses that Appellant's claims are without merit. Accord- ingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Stansbury, No. CR-89-434-S (D. Md. June 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2