Filed: July 9, 1998
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2610
CA-93-1064-2-18AJ
JEROME M. MYERS; SAMUEL KENNLEY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
LANTZ H. LITTLE; W. L. PACE; REGINALD A. LEE;
JAMES E. YOUNG; ELMER E. MARTIN; UNDRA L.
EVERSON; JIMMIE S. TAYLOR; THOMAS O. WILLIAMS;
NORMAN ROBERT KNIGHT, III,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
PETER CAMPBELL,
Claimant.
No. 96-2698
CA-93-1914-2-18
ARTHUR PINCKNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
NORMAN WITHERSPOON; THOMAS WILLIAMS; CYNTHIA
H. COAXUM; LUCILLE MYERS; NORMAN JAMES
WITHERSPOON,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
FRANK SIMMONS, JR.,
Claimant.
No. 96-2699
CA-93-3206-2-18AJ
ELZINE R. FABERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
WILLIAM L. DIBBLE; NATHANIEL JUST; JAMES H.
MOULTRIE; NATHANIEL JONES; ELDRIDGE C. LEE;
ARTHUR L. NESBITT; HENRY L. MOORE, JR.,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
2
No. 96-2720
CA-93-2410-2-18AJ
DAVID RILEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
THURMOND HAMMOND; CAROLYN G. CHAVIS; HORACE
WILLIAMS; ODIS C. MOORE, JR.; WILLIAM GLOVER,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 96-2721
CA-93-2410-2-18AJ
CAROLYN G. CHAVIS; WILLIAM GLOVER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
THURMOND HAMMOND; DAVID RILEY; HORACE
WILLIAMS; ODIS C. MOORE, JR.,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
3
Defendant - Appellee.
4
No. 96-2771
CA-93-3293-2-18AJ
FRANK REED,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JASPER M. BRYANT; CATHIE M. CRAWFORD; JOHN
DINGLE; HARVEY J. DOCTOR; SEAFUS JORDAN; LEROY
M. LLOYD; ABRAHAM J. SMALLS; RICHARD A.
SPENCER; JOSEPH SWINTON, JR.; VENA L. VAIRD;
JAMES L. WASHINGTON,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 97-1859
CA-93-2410-2-18AJ
HORACE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
THURMOND HAMMOND; CAROLYN G. CHAVIS; DAVID
RILEY; ODIS C. MOORE, JR.; WILLIAM L. GLOVER,
Plaintiffs,
versus
5
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 97-1860
CA-93-3206-2-18AJ
HENRY L. MOORE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
WILLIAM L. DIBBLE; NATHANIEL JUST; JAMES H.
MOULTRIE; ELZINE R. FABERS; NATHANIEL JONES;
ELDRIDGE C. LEE; ARTHUR L. NESBITT,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
O R D E R
Appellants in the above-styled appeals were not afforded an
opportunity to file informal briefs prior to our disposition of
their appeals. In order for these Appellants to submit informal
briefs for our review before we act on their appeals, we construe
their post-decision pro se filings as petitions for rehearing and
grant rehearing for the limited purpose of reviewing their informal
6
briefs. We direct that the Clerk’s Office issue an informal
briefing order in these appeals directing that these Appellants
mail their informal briefs to this Court no later than August 3,
1998.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Patricia S. Connor
7
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2324
NORMAN ROBERT KNIGHT, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
LANTZ H. LITTLE; W. L. PACE; JEROME M. MYERS;
REGINALD A. LEE; JAMES E. YOUNG; ELMER E.
MARTIN; UNDRA L. EVERSON; JIMMIE S. TAYLOR;
SAMUEL KENNLEY; THOMAS O. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
PETER CAMPBELL,
Claimant.
No. 96-2325
JAKE LEE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
8
and
PONCE DELEON JONES; JAMES L. CRAWFORD; WILLIAM
E. REID, JR.; SHERMAN WESLEY BARCLIFF,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
PETER CAMPBELL,
Claimant.
No. 96-2365
PONCE DELEON JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JAKE LEE, JR.; JAMES L. CRAWFORD; WILLIAM E.
REID, JR.; SHERMAN WESLEY BARCLIFF,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee,
9
and
PETER CAMPBELL,
Claimant.
No. 96-2610
JEROME M. MYERS; SAMUEL KENNLEY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
LANTZ H. LITTLE; W. L. PACE; REGINALD A. LEE;
JAMES E. YOUNG; ELMER E. MARTIN; UNDRA L.
EVERSON; JIMMIE S. TAYLOR; THOMAS O. WILLIAMS;
NORMAN ROBERT KNIGHT, III,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
PETER CAMPBELL,
Claimant.
10
No. 96-2698
ARTHUR PINCKNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
NORMAN WITHERSPOON; THOMAS WILLIAMS; CYNTHIA
H. COAXUM; LUCILLE MYERS; NORMAN JAMES
WITHERSPOON,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
FRANK SIMMONS, JR.,
Claimant.
No. 96-2699
ELZINE R. FABERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
11
WILLIAM L. DIBBLE; NATHANIEL JUST; JAMES H.
MOULTRIE; NATHANIEL JONES; ELDRIDGE C. LEE;
ARTHUR L. NESBITT; HENRY L. MOORE, JR.,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 96-2700
STANLEY E. SHAW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JERALD WATSON; ROBERT WATSON; JAMES FRAZIER
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 96-2720
DAVID RILEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
12
and
THURMOND HAMMOND; CAROLYN G. CHAVIS; HORACE
WILLIAMS; ODIS C. MOORE, JR.; WILLIAM GLOVER,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 96-2721
CAROLYN G. CHAVIS; WILLIAM GLOVER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
and
THURMOND HAMMOND; DAVID RILEY; HORACE
WILLIAMS; ODIS C. MOORE, JR.,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
13
No. 96-2771
FRANK REED,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JASPER M. BRYANT; CATHIE M. CRAWFORD; JOHN
DINGLE; HARVEY J. DOCTOR; SEAFUS JORDAN; LEROY
M. LLOYD; ABRAHAM J. SMALLS; RICHARD A.
SPENCER; JOSEPH SWINTON, JR.; VENA L. VAIRD;
JAMES L. WASHINGTON,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 96-2772
JAMES E. YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
NORMAN ROBERT KNIGHT, III; LANTZ H. LITTLE; W.
L. PACE;JEROME M. MYERS; REGINALD A. LEE;
ELMER E. MARTIN; UNDRA L. EVERSON; JIMMIE S.
TAYLOR; SAMUEL KENNLEY; THOMAS O. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiffs,
versus
14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
PETER CAMPBELL,
Claimant.
No. 97-1768
NORMAN ROBERT KNIGHT, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
LANTZ H. LITTLE; W. L. PACE; JEROME M. MYERS;
REGINALD A. LEE; JAMES E. YOUNG; ELMER E.
MARTIN; UNDRA L. EVERSON; JIMMIE S. TAYLOR;
SAMUEL KENNLEY; THOMAS O. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
PETER CAMPBELL,
Claimant.
15
No. 97-1857
REGINALD A. LEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
NORMAN ROBERT KNIGHT, III; LANTZ H. LITTLE; W.
L. PACE; JEROME M. MYERS; JAMES E. YOUNG;
ELMER E. MARTIN; UNDRA L. EVERSON; JIMMIE S.
TAYLOR; SAMUEL KENNLEY; THOMAS O. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
PETER CAMPBELL,
Claimant.
No. 97-1858
WILLIAM E. REID, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
16
and
JAKE LEE, JR.; PONCE DELEON JONES; JAMES L.
CRAWFORD; SHERMAN WESLEY BARCLIFF,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
PETER CAMPBELL,
Claimant.
No. 97-1859
HORACE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
THURMOND HAMMOND; CAROLYN G. CHAVIS; DAVID
RILEY; ODIS C. MOORE, JR.; WILLIAM L. GLOVER,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
17
No. 97-1860
HENRY L. MOORE, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
WILLIAM L. DIBBLE; NATHANIEL JUST; JAMES H.
MOULTRIE; ELZINE R. FABERS; NATHANIEL JONES;
ELDRIDGE C. LEE; ARTHUR L. NESBITT,
Plaintiffs,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(CA-93-1064-2-18AJ, CA-93-2081-2-18AJ, CA-93-1914-2-18, CA-93-3206-
2-18AJ, CA-94-479-2-18AJ, CA-93-2410-2-18AJ, CA-93-3293-2-18AJ)
Submitted: May 19, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
18
Norman Robert Knight, III, Jake Lee, Jr., Ponce DeLeon Jones,
Jerome M. Myers, Samuel Kennley, Arthur Pinckney, Elzine R. Fabers,
Stanley E. Shaw, David Riley, Carolyn G. Chavis, William L. Glover,
Frank Reed, James E. Young, Norman Robert Knight, III, Reginald A.
Lee, William E. Reid, Horace Williams, Henry L. Moore, Jr.,
Appellants Pro Se. John Harris Douglas, Assistant United States
Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
19
PER CURIAM:
This is a consolidated appeal. In case Nos. 96-2324, 96-2325,
96-2365, 96-2610, 96-2698, 96-2699, 96-2700, 96-2720, 96-2721, 96-
2771, and 96-2772, the Appellants appeal the district court's
orders granting the Navy summary judgment in their civil action
filed under the Privacy Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 552a (1994), and deny-
ing their motion styled "Motion for a Status Conference Hearing and
Rule 60(b) Errors Correction." In case Nos. 97-1860, 97-1859, 97-
1858, and 97-1857, the Appellants appeal only the denial of the mo-
tion styled "Motion for a Status Conference Hearing and Rule 60(b)
Errors Correction." Finally, the Appellant in No. 97-1768 appeals
the district court's order granting counsel's request to be
relieved. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
thorough and well-reasoned opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. No.
96-2324, Knight v. Department of the Navy, No. CA-93-1064-2-18AJ
(D.S.C. Sept. 18, 1996; May 27, 1997); No. 96-2325, Lee v. Depart-
ment of the Navy, No. CA-93-2081-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 1996; May
27, 1997); No. 96-2365, Jones v. Department of the Navy, No. CA-93-
2081-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 1996; May 27, 1997); No. 96-2610,
Myers v. Department of the Navy, No. CA-93-1064-2-18AJ (D.S.C.
Sept. 18, 1996; May 27, 1997); No. 96-2698, Pinckney v. Department
of the Navy, No. CA-93-1914-2-18 (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 1996; May 27,
1997); No. 96-2699, Fabers v. Department of the Navy, No. CA-93-
3206-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 1996; May 27, 1997); No. 96-2700,
Shaw v. Department of the Navy, No. CA-94-479-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Sept.
20
18, 1996; May 27, 1997); No. 96-2720, Riley v. Department of the
Navy, No. CA-93-2410-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 1996; May 27, 1997);
No. 96-2721, Chavis v. Department of the Navy, No. CA-93-2410-2-
18AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 1996; May 27, 1997); No. 96-2771, Reed v.
Department of the Navy, No. CA-93-3293-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 18,
1996; May 27, 1997); No. 96-2772, Young v. Department of the Navy,
No. CA-93-1064-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 1996); No. 97-1768, Knight
v. Department of the Navy, No. CA-93-1064-2-18-AJ (D.S.C. May 20,
1997); No. 97-1857, Lee v. Department of the Navy, No. CA-93-1064-
2-18AJ (D.S.C. May 27, 1997); No. 97-1858, Reid v. Department of
the Navy, No. CA-93-2081-2-18AJ (D.S.C. May 27, 1997); No. 97-1859,
Williams v. Department of the Navy, No. CA-93-2410-2-18AJ (D.S.C.
May 27, 1997); No. 97-1860, Moore v. Department of the Navy, No.
CA-93-3206-2-18AJ (D.S.C. May 27, 1997). We grant the motions to
adopt other Appellants' informal briefs. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
21