UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6320
JOSEPH FREDERICK MOORE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
H. R. POWELL, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
(CA-97-595-3)
Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Frederick Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assis-
tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &
Supp. 1998), as untimely filed. Appellant’s conviction became final
before April 24, 1996, the effective date of the Antiterrorism and
Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. On August 5, 1997, Appellant
filed a § 2254 petition. The district court denied relief because
Appellant filed his petition outside the one-year limitation period
imposed by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d) (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). See
Brown v. Angelone, ___ F.3d ___, Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208, 1998 WL
389030 (4th Cir. July 14, 1998) (holding that petitioner had until
April 23, 1997, in which to file a timely petition). Because
Appellant filed his § 2254 petition after April 23, 1997, and be-
cause his second state post-conviction petition did not toll the
limitation period, we find that the petition was untimely filed.
See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2244(d)(1), (2). Accordingly, we deny a certifi-
cate of appealability, deny Appellant’s motion to expedite the
appeal as moot, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2